Those "cultural Marxist-Feminists" are fighting for paycheck parity, cultural value against a devaluing society and rights men have no understnding of.
Here it is 2012 and the Equal Rights Amendment is still not ratified.
Ever wonder why there is no form of female Viagra? Because society doesn't value women enough to create one.
You've got to be trolling me but I'll play along, this is pretty good actually. I would respond as:
1) paycheck parity: Males have been harder hit by the recession then females, there are more females in college than males now, there have never been more women at all levels of corporate, academic, cultural, and political power. However you gals are tweaking the numbers so you can trot out that old "paycheck parity" mannequin and try to make it dance yet one more time.
2)"cultural value against a devaluing society and rights men have no understnding of": So to translate, "and a buch of other shit I don't have to tell you about but which owns yooooo." Mmmm-hmmm. Humor me with specifics.
3)Equal rights ammendment? What the fuck, lady? You think this is 1978 or some shit? Who are you, Cathy Lee Crosby?
4)Female viagra: On that we can agree, babe! Bring it, I join you in welcoming in great rivers any new and legal psychotropic that makes girls take off their clothes more eagerly.
TMB is a tiny % of men, like the 1 percenters. 80% of women desire 20% of men, very few men hold all of the power/money and the decisionmaking, the rest are just slaves, yet a much higher percentage of women desire that tiny percent of men who have all the power. THAT IS TFB.
The same works in reverse. 80% of men desire 20% of women.
I hate most women, sure. You'd have to be an idiot not to.
I actually kind of agree with you. But I think hate is the wrong word. Yes, there are things I can hate about each and every person I meet. But more often than hate, it's just dislike. I dislike a lot about most people I meet based on their incompatibility with my critical foundations and what I prefer to surround myself with. If this weren't the case, it would be pretty damn near impossible to choose a mate or friends. It's just human nature
You've got to be trolling me but I'll play along, this is pretty good actually. I would respond as:
1) paycheck parity: Males have been harder hit by the recession then females, there are more females in college than males now, there have never been more women at all levels of corporate, academic, cultural, and political power. However you gals are tweaking the numbers so you can trot out that old "paycheck parity" mannequin and try to make it dance yet one more time.
2)"cultural value against a devaluing society and rights men have no understnding of": So to translate, "and a buch of other shit I don't have to tell you about but which owns yooooo." Mmmm-hmmm. Humor me with specifics.
3)Equal rights ammendment? What the fuck, lady? You think this is 1978 or some shit? Who are you, Cathy Lee Crosby?
4)Female viagra: On that we can agree, babe! Bring it, I join you in welcoming in great rivers any new and legal psychotropic that makes girls take off their clothes more eagerly.
Why would you even suggest that "males have been harder hit by the recession then females"?
Why would you even suggest that "males have been harder hit by the recession then females"?
That's inane as is the rest of your post.
It's been called the "Mancession" idiot because it heavily affected industrial jobs.
Ever wonder why you never hear about women dying in mining disasters? Because no women work in them. They make okay money because of the danger premium.
Why is it that women only seek equality at the top? They complain about not enough CEOs or elected representatives are women, but never seek to get equality in janitorial jobs, mining jobs, or slaughterhouse jobs? Why only at the top?
It's been called the "Mancession" idiot because it heavily affected industrial jobs.
Ever wonder why you never hear about women dying in mining disasters? Because no women work in them. They make okay money because of the danger premium.
Why is it that women only seek equality at the top? They complain about not enough CEOs or elected representatives are women, but never seek to get equality in janitorial jobs, mining jobs, or slaughterhouse jobs? Why only at the top?
They seek parity in all types of jobs. You're a fucking idiot.
You've got to be trolling me but I'll play along, this is pretty good actually. I would respond as:
1) paycheck parity: Males have been harder hit by the recession then females, there are more females in college than males now, there have never been more women at all levels of corporate, academic, cultural, and political power. However you gals are tweaking the numbers so you can trot out that old "paycheck parity" mannequin and try to make it dance yet one more time.
2)"cultural value against a devaluing society and rights men have no understnding of": So to translate, "and a buch of other shit I don't have to tell you about but which owns yooooo." Mmmm-hmmm. Humor me with specifics.
3)Equal rights ammendment? What the fuck, lady? You think this is 1978 or some shit? Who are you, Cathy Lee Crosby?
4)Female viagra: On that we can agree, babe! Bring it, I join you in welcoming in great rivers any new and legal psychotropic that makes girls take off their clothes more eagerly.
Why would you even suggest that "males have been harder hit by the recession then females"?
That's inane as is the rest of your post.
A Very Male Recession: Men Hit Hardest by Job Losses
DER SPIEGEL
They seek parity in all types of jobs. You're a fucking idiot.
I can't believe I fell for this troll.
Yes I suppose that' why feminists in say countries like Sweden pass laws mandating that women be a % of the board of directors, but no such requirement for miner jobs to go to women. Yup, women seek equality everywhere, not just at the top
I actually kind of agree with you. But I think hate is the wrong word. Yes, there are things I can hate about each and every person I meet. But more often than hate, it's just dislike. I dislike a lot about most people I meet based on their incompatibility with my critical foundations and what I prefer to surround myself with. If this weren't the case, it would be pretty damn near impossible to choose a mate or friends. It's just human nature
I say "hate" because I want to drop them down mile deep boreholes.
And if "that's insane" is the best you can do, I'll save my longwinded posts for someone who at least swallows.
"Job losses have hit women hardest
Unemployment figures were better than expected, but women and young people are suffering most in a tough labour market"
Yes I suppose that' why feminists in say countries like Sweden pass laws mandating that women be a % of the board of directors, but no such requirement for miner jobs to go to women. Yup, women seek equality everywhere, not just at the top